Reading Room

Proposed Elimination of the Reverse Offset

Proposed Elimination of the Reverse Offset

Workers' Compensation

The FY 2020 Budget proposed the elimination of the workers’ compensation reverse offset. The elimination will act as a cost-saving measure. It will level the playing field for all workers’ compensation systems throughout the United States.

The Budget 
submitted to Congress earlier this month anticipates a cost saving of over 217,000,000 for 2010-2019 alone if the reverse offset is eliminated. See FY 2020 Budget p. 119. “The savings are part of a proposed $1.9 trillion cost savings from mandatory safety-net programs, like Medicaid and Medicare, the federal health care programs for the elderly and the poor.” See “Trump Proposes a Record $4.75 Trillion Budget”, NY Times 3/11/2019. 

The Whitehouse, asserting that the Budget would have curbed wasteful Washington spending and put taxpayers first, released the following statement, “In the last two years, President Trump and this Administration have prioritized reining in reckless Washington spending. The Budget that we have presented to Congress and the American people, “A Budget for a Better America,” embodies fiscal responsibility and takes aim at Washington’s waste, fraud, and abuse,” said Acting Director Vought. “Our national debt nearly doubled under the previous Administration and now stands at more than $22 trillion. This Budget shows that we can return to fiscal sanity without halting our economic resurgence while continuing to invest in critical priorities. President Trump’s Budget for 2020 will balance in 15 years, end runaway spending, and secure prosperity for future generations. “
Administration Presents President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Request,” 3/11/19. 

Judge David Langham has noted, NJ is one of a few remaining states that include: Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin, where insurance companies/states instead of the Social Security Administration, still are permitted under law, to take credit. See Social Security Program Operations Manual System (POMS)

Social Security provides that “Claims that involve a reduction in disability insurance benefits (DIB) benefits due to the receipt of workers’ compensation (WC) and/or public disability benefits (PDB) are selected for a possible benefit increase every three years (i.e., triennially) due to a rise in the national earnings level. This redetermination [REDET] of the ACE is protection against inflation.” See 
DI 52150.080 Triennial Redetermination (Redet) of the Average Current Earnings (ACE) 

“The New Jersey Workers' Compensation Act permits an offset for social security disability benefits against workers' compensation benefits. Those individuals under the age of 62 who receive benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act following either statutory section 34:15-95 or 34:15-12(b) are subject to having their benefits reduced by an amount equal to that payable under the Federal Old-Age, Survivor's and Disability Insurance Act but in an amount not to exceed the reduction statutorily prescribed in 42 U.S.C.A.” Gelman, Jon L, Workers’ Compensation Law, 38 NJPRAC 18.1 (Thomson-Reuters 2018). 

And NJ administratively does not allow COLA increases under the Triennial Redetermination [REDET] of the Average Current Earnings (ACE) adjustment. See, “As long as the State has a process that recognizes the statutory framework of the offset provisions under section 224 of the Act, its application and procedures for addressing the triennial redetermination process under 22470 is within State jurisdiction and not subject to Federal review,” Letter G Sklar to LJ Crider, 12/10/2004.

The proposal would have balanced the playing field for all states so costs would be equalized, and no single state would take an economic advantage by shifting costs to US taxpayers. It would have allowed additional benefits to be paid to injured workers in present reverse offset states now unable to obtain REDIT payments. The Trump Administration FY 2020 Budget on this issue is on-point and is a significant step forward for all.


The author, Jon L. Gelman, practices law in Wayne, NJ. He is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters). For over five decades, the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman  1.973.696.7900 have represented injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.

Recommended Citation: Gelman, Jon L.,  Proposed Elimination of the Reverse Offset, (2020),

© 2001-2023 Jon L Gelman. All rights reserved.

Attorney Advertising

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Download Adobe Reader

Previous Article Equal Pay for Equal Work is the Law in New Jersey
Next Article A new wave of occupational litigation - Flavor & Fragrance Lawsuits

Documents to download