The Evolution of Latex Glove Litigation and Regulations
During the emergence of the AIDs crisis, personal protective equipment [PPE], such as latex gloves, was mandated to control the spread of a viral infection. Some of the products were manufactured containing Natural Rubber Latex [NRL] which caused an allergic reaction. During the COVID-19 Pandemic, medical gloves were employed almost universally in the healthcare setting to prevent infection.
Latex allergy symptoms include hives, itching, and stuffy or running nose. It can cause asthma symptoms, including anaphylaxis, a serious medical; condition that can cause difficulty breathing and a fall in blood pressure. Additional dermatological conditions include allergic contact dermatitis and eczema, and blisters. Food allergies are commonly associated with people who suffer from latex reactions, including apples, avocados, bananas, celery, and tomatoes.
A blood test is utilized to confirm the diagnosis of latex sensitivity.
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LITIGATION
Over the last few years, there has been a significant increase in the amount of workers' compensation claims filed against employers on behalf of individuals who have suffered latex allergic reactions. See Helland v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hosp., 601 NW 2d 318 - Wis: Court of Appeals 1999, and workers' compensation decision Claim No. 1996030302 April 23, 2003 (Westlaw citation 2003 WL 21054452 (Wis.Lab.Ind.Rev.Com.), Morris v. Nebraska Health System, 664 NW 2d 436 - Neb: Supreme Court 2003, St. Luke's Midland Regional v. Kennedy, 653 NW 2d 880 - SD: Supreme Court 2002, Dunbar v Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Westlaw citation 2002 WL 31681349 (SD 2002).
Furthermore, many claims were filed against the manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors of latex gloves and products. The claims filed in the Federal District court throughout the United States have been joined in one action for pretrial management and discovery by a Multi-District Litigation Order issued by the court. In re Latex Gloves Product Liability Litigation, MDL #1148 (Terminated 2005). See In re Latex Gloves Products Liability Litigation, 152 F. Supp. 2d 667 - Dist. Court, ED Pennsylvania 2001, Collins v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 949 F. Supp. 1143 - Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2112.
US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
“On December 19, 2016, the FDA published a final rule banning powdered gloves based on the unreasonable and substantial risk of illness or injury to individuals exposed to the powdered gloves. The risks to patients and health care providers when internal body tissue is exposed to the powder include severe airway inflammation and hypersensitivity reactions. Powder particles may also trigger the body's immune response, causing tissue to form around the particles (granulomas) or scar tissue formation (adhesions), which can lead to surgical complications.” See, Banned Devices; Powdered Surgeon's Gloves, Powdered Patient Examination Gloves, and Absorbable Powder for Lubricating a Surgeon's Glove 81 FR 91722. Effective January 18, 2017.
US OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
The Occupational Safety & Health Administration [OSHA] of the United States Department of Labor estimates that 8-12% of healthcare workers are sensitive. The FDA received more than 1,000 reports of adverse health effects from exposure to latex, including 15 deaths from latex glove exposure. OSHA issued a General Industry Standard (29 CFR 1920) to regulate latex glove use in the workplace.
By Jon L. Gelman of Wayne, NJ. He is the author of NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters) and co-author of the national treatise Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (Thomson-Reuters). For over five decades, the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 email@example.com have represented injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.
Recommended Citation: Gelman, Jon L., The Evolution of Latex Glove Litigation and Regulations, www.gelmans.com (2021), https://www.gelmans.com/ReadingRoom/tabid/65/ArtMID/1482/ArticleID/903/preview/true/Default.aspx
© 2001-2023 Jon L Gelman. All rights reserved.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Download Adobe Reader
Concern of potential adverse affects from latex by consumers and health care patients with Hevea Natural Rubber Latex AllergyOSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations.
Labeling of LatexOSHA requirements are set by statute, standards and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed.
Bloodborne Pathogens and the issue of latex allergy and latex hypersensitivityThis is in response to an information request of August 15, on behalf of your constituent, Dr. Lyndon E. Mansfield, concerning the issue of latex allergy and latex hypersensitivity. Your letter was forwarded to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Directorate of Technical Support for response. Please accept our apology for the delay in this response.
Latex AllergiesLatex gloves have proved effective in preventing transmission of many infectious diseases to health care workers. But for some workers, exposures to latex may result in allergic reactions. Reports of such reactions have increased in recent years–especially among health care workers.
Percutaneous reactivity to natural rubber latex proteins persists in health-care workers following avoidance of natural rubber latexWhile symptoms may resolve quickly with NRL avoidance therapy, detectable IgE indicating continued sensitization remains beyond 5 years, and thus continued avoidance of NRL should be recommended.
NIOSH Alerts Home Healthcare Workers About Latex AllergiesNIOSH (The National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety) has published a booklet to educate Home Healthcare Workers about preventing latex allergies. Latex products are made from natural rubber, and sensitivity can develop after repeated exposure. Limiting exposure to latex can help prevent allergic reactions for both home healthcare workers and their clients.
US FDA Medical Glove Guidance ManualThis manual provides FDA’s recommendations for Premarket Notification (510(k)) submissions for medical gloves.
Reducing workers' compensation costs for latex allergy and litigation against glove manufacturing companiesAdverse reactions to natural latex gloves, such as contact dermatitis and urticaria, occupational asthma, and anaphylaxis, have been documented as a significant cause of Workers' Compensation claims among health-care workers.
Defense Denied Medical Expert When Latex-Free Environment Not GuaranteedAn injured worker who was a waste remover and who developed sensitivity and sustained an anaphylactic reaction to latex requiring emergency room treatment, did not have to submit to a defense medical examination. The injured worker had positive test results, which demonstrated a very strong latex sensitivity. There was no credible evidence that the defense medical expert’s office was latex-free and he could not guarantee that there was no latex in his office. The reviewing tribunal affirmed the